South Face of WTC 1
10:23 AM
Inward bowing
Max bowing of 55 in.


  • Maximum = 55 inches
    (uncertainty ~ +/- 6 inches

Return to: WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory

"There would not be warning signs that the buildings were about to be demolished by explosives, it would just suddenly happen without any indication. But the buildings did not suddenly collapse without any indications. Instead, exterior columns buckled because the fires weakened the floor trusses and the floors sagged. The sagging floors pulled on intact column connections so as the floors sagged down, they pulled the exterior columns inward. This inward bowing of the exterior columns was evident to observers such as the police helicopters circling the towers." - Representative Press

Please help Representative Press get the truth out about 9/11. The fact is the World Trade Center did not collapse because of "controlled demolition." The fact is we were attacked because of specific foreign policies. We are still at grave risk* of being attacked by terrorists because of specific foreign policies. We must examine these policies because our lives are on the line. Instead, many people are being misdirected from discussing the prime motive for the September 11th attacks. And those not misdirected are being silenced and ignored. Mainstream media is playing along with the suppression. When Hamilton was confronted at the Public Discourse Project" Q&A on August 2, 2005 it should have been the lead story on the TV news that night! Instead it was not even mentioned.

Questioner: Why aren't we addressing the gorilla in the room? The gorilla in the room is US support for Israel. You had made a mistake earlier. You had said that the Israeli-Palestinian dispute wasn't addressed in the 9/11 Commission Report. I beg to differ with that, on page 147, it is stated that the plotter of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, was driven to attack us, - not because of "radical ideologies" as Prime Minister Blair [had claimed -, but] because of US support for Israel.* Why aren't we addressing that sir? - 9/11 Public Discourse Project Q&A 8/2/05

* He is correct, on page 147 of the 9/11 Commission Report, it says "By his own account, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's animus toward the United States stemmed not from his experiences there as a student, but rather from his violent disagreement with U.S. foreign policy favoring Israel." - The man who conceived and directed the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, was motivated by his strong disagreement with American support for Israel

Getting these foreign policies addressed is going to take a lot of effort. This is an uphill battle and that is why your donation is so desperately needed. We should not be misled about why are lives are at risk. Please help spread the truth.
*Study: 50 percent chance of major attack in next 5 years
By wire services
Published June 23, 2005
WASHINGTON - The world faces an estimated 50 percent chance of a nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attack over the next five years, according to national security analysts surveyed for a congressional study released Wednesday.
Using a poll of 85 nonproliferation and national security experts, the report also estimated the risk of attack by weapons of mass destruction at as high as 70 percent over the coming decade.